buttsock:

Reminder that Lena Dunham wrote an autobiographical book in which she molests and abuses her little sister and nothing ever happened to her legally. Reminder that Lena’s sister has openly stated that growing up she felt like her sisters property. Reminder that a self-admitted pedophile runs a successful TV show and is still considered a feminist icon by a lot of people. Reminder that this world is a shitty and disgusting place.

Lolicon/Shotacon hurts children in Japan

featheredfelon:

irkencasualwear:

wyvernsdreams:

oreides:

“Shihoko Fujiwara runs Lighthouse, a nonprofit for exploited children. She told CNN she once worked on a case where a predator used a cartoon to convince a child that sex abuse was normal. “So the pedophiles might bring the animation and say ‘this is how you practice with adults,’” she said.

Child abuse in Japan

While no link has been made between anime, manga and child abuse, Japan is facing a “serious” child abuse problem, according to a White Paper issued by the National Police Agency in March.

The paper said the number of child abuse victims jumped 20% between 2011 and 2012, and the number of victims, arrests and cases are at their highest levels since they started compiling statistics in 1999.

At the same time, the number of cleared child pornography crime cases rose to 1,596, the highest ever recorded, the paper said. Most – 85% – were Internet-related. The figures inspired the U.S. State Department to label Japan as an “international hub” for producing and trafficking child pornography.

The U.S. report noted that no national law addresses the “unfettered availability of sexual explicit cartoons, comics and video games, some of which depicted scenes of violent sexual abuse and the rape of children.

It added: ‘While the NPA continued to maintain that no link was established between these animated images and child victimization, other experts suggested children are harmed by a culture that appears to accept child sexual abuse.”

#gee who woulda thought that depicting children in sexual situations would lead to it occurring more in real life

This needs to be fucking slam-dunked in the faces of every single abhorrent and disgusting pedophile and/or pedo-apologist that wants to cry and whine about how fictitious child pornography doesn’t contribute to nor perpetuate CSA just as real footage or photographs of children does; those disgusting clods who insist that fictitious depictions of children in sexual situations doesn’t somehow normalize the idea that sexualizing
children is okay, and that it doesn’t ~actually~ harm anyone… as if this form of child pornography exists in a vacuum.

Lolicon and Shotacon are child pornography.  They hurt children in Japan, and most likely children in other various places world-wide where this type of child pornography spreads.  Why?  Because child pornography is child pornography, plain and simple, and every last bit of it is toxic and harmful… and this particular variety only makes it easier for pedophiles to victimize children due to its “appealing” style, so don’t you dare ever say that it’s somehow more acceptable for child pornography to exist and that it’s somehow not harmful – all because it’s DRAWN.

*furiously mashes this into everyones disgusting faces*

I mean based on my own experience and the stories of so many others I don’t understand how like there isn’t more ‘official’ statistics on this. It seems everyone I talk to about this has been groomed in some way by fictitious child porn whether written in fanfiction or by artwork not to mention the amount of paedophiles who are busted and its proven that they have also used fictional child porn to groom children that they have abused. 

Like ugh I have a lot of thoughts and brain static here but yeah anyone who doubts or rejects this and proceeds to support and produce paedophilic content is vile, dangerous and dont ever think for one second they are not aware of what they’re doing. They are. They do not care about abuse victims they simply care about their own desires and normalising these desires to make it easier for them to get off free of issue. Regardless to whether they’re also survivors or not it doesn’t excuse this. 

(And like I’ve said before I really cant get my head around, how, as a survivor, you would be totally okay with your personal “therapy” material being utilised by paedophiles to abuse others the way you were ?? why would that not trouble you and why would you not take precautions to prevent that???)

I mean on the topic of child porn as personal therapy yea. Ok. Fine. Ok. I dont really agree. But if thats REALLY the intention there is ABSOLUTELY no reason for them to continually inject this content into wide varied public audiences regardless of age or consent. 

And like Yeah. They’ll say things like IF ITS TAGGED JUST AVOID THE TAGS YOU DONT LIKE, ITS YOUR JOB… But I mean theres a lot of reasons thats bullshit and the most glaring, particularly in my case and personal experience, is that when you have pedophiles and abusers consuming this content they are taking it and using it for their own means. There was no fucking tags or archive warnings or whatever that would have prevented me from seeing my abuser copy pasting passages of their favourite fics to me over MSN or linking me directly to said fics. God there are so many reasons why the archive warnings shit is a broken dumb ass argument in regard to sharing and producing this. 

The complete lack of regard for this really says it all. You can keep it to yourself, and your consenting significant other in that whole therapy bubble, but when you make it an entirely public affair and all you’re worried about is defending it and validating yourself guess what???? You’re not doing this to cope with your trauma. You’re not. You’re making all the exact same excuses practising pedophiles use. Your only concern is validating yourself and creating a personal echochamber in which you can normalise this sort content toward children regardless to the harm it does for YOUR OWN BENEFIT and at the expense of others.

Lolicon/Shotacon hurts children in Japan

thelittlemightyone:

hi uh this is just a psa

IM ANTI-PEDOPHILE
IM ANTI-MAP
IM ANTI-KINDERGENDER OR WHATEVER THE FUCK IT IS

PUT ME ON THE ANTI MASTERLISTS!!!!

IF YOURE A PEDOPHILE BLOCK ME!!!! IF YOU’RE A PEDOPHILE APOLOGIST BLOCK ME!!! IF YOU BELIEVE PEDOPHILES BELONG ANYWHERE NEAR THE LBGT+ COMMUNITY BLOCK ME!!!!! IF YOU’RE A MINOR ATTRACTED PERSON OR WHATEVER BLOCK ME!!!!

BASICALLY IF YOU’RE AN ADULT WHO IS ATTRACTED TO MINORS AND/OR BELIEVE YOU BELONG ANYWHERE NEAR THE LBGT+ COMMUNITY SMACK THAT BLOCK BUTTON!!!! I DONT WANT YOU INTERACTING WITH ME OR MY POSTS!!!!!! BYE!!!!

golbatgender:

Do antis and aphobes who yell about shipping actually give a damn about RL pedophilia culture like super extreme gender specific school dress codes, or parents who don’t let girls wear like tank tops or leggings in the house because it’s “inappropriate” for the father/brothers to see, or parents who think their same sex children don’t get to have boundaries from them because “we’re all boys/girls here,” or parents who tell their daughters “you’re a woman now” the day they get their first period and then treat them as sexually equivalent to a woman even though they’re maybe 10 or 12, or mothers who think they can put their hands up their daughter’s shirt to “stretch it out” or minutely pick over her body sexually “because I just don’t want you to look like rape bait, sweetie"—or is it only if it’s fictional characters in a made up story where half the time what’s going on isn’t nearly that bad anyway?

I wanna throw up in my mouth reading this. First of all, gtfo with this “antis and aphobes” b/s. Secondly, as an actual CSA victim, I can acknowledge that there are pedophiles in fandom spaces that we shouldn’t be enabling AND exposing real life situations that enable those very same pedophiles at the same time!!! I can walk and talk and chew gum, all at the same time!!! Fucking ground breaking!!!

sjwpanderer:

mishkablackpaw:

sirartwork:

its-pronounced-eye-gore:

nevaehtyler:

that mf’s sentence was reduced by 26 years…

They Freddy Kruegered his ass fuck yeah he deserved that

y’all left out one of the best parts

Please stop using the term pedophile for people who molest and rape kids. These are two different things. He is a child molester, which makes him a pedophile but not all pedophiles actually molest or rape children.

Child molester = pedophile but pedophile == child molester.

I’m glad the parents fucked him up, hopefully he will get prison time for his actions and court mandated therapy for the rest of his life.

hey this sounds like bait but i’ll bite. did you really just say “not all pedophiles”

HE’S A PEDOPHILE!!! PEDOPHILES DESERVE TO DIE!! HE’S A PEDOPHILE!!! PEDOPHILES DESERVE TO DIE!!! HE’S A PEDOPHILE!!! PEDOPHILES DESERVE TO DIE!! HE’S A PEDOPHILE!!! PEDOPHILES DESERVE TO DIE!! HE’S A PEDOPHILE!!! PEDOPHILES DESERVE TO DIE!! HE’S A PEDOPHILE!!! PEDOPHILES DESERVE TO DIE!! HE’S A PEDOPHILE!!! PEDOPHILES DESERVE TO DIE!!

awaitingthematriarchy:

reyagainstreylo:

snapthesjw:

kinkshameree:

something the ddlg community seems to fail to acknowledge is that sexual arousal and orgasms are powerful conditioning tools. if you and your daddy sexualize childlike behavior, children’s innocence and helplessness, childlike speech/baby talk, children’s objects and toys, children’s clothing, etc etc these things will become sexual to you, anyone who’s taken the most basic psychology course can tell you this. your brains will literally begin to associate them on their own with sexual arousal and your “daddy’s” brain and dick will respond accordingly. he might absolutely get turned on seeing a child behaving and dressing and talking the very same way his “little” does simply because he’s used to all of these things being involved when he gets off.

he might not have started out as a pedophile and the two of you may be “consenting adults”, but use your critical thinking for a moment and realize that normalizing this pedophilic dynamic will make you both desensitized to it. the same way continuous exposure to violent porn creates a link between violence and sexual arousal for those consuming it, being turned on and getting orgasms while roleplaying pedophilia will cause a link to form between sexual arousal and childlike. your kink harms children, bye

i forget where I heard this from, but it’s like this: you’re conditioning yourself to react to specific things in a sexual way

think of it like a bell rings whenever a dog is about to get fed. soon the dog begins salivating and getting excited every time it hears a bell ring bc it associates that sound with getting fed.

by partaking in the ddlg kink, you’re associating sexual things with specific childlike behaviour, and soon enough every time you see these things you’re gonna react in the same way bc of the sexual connotations you’re associating that behaviour with

I found it!! It’s called ‘classical conditioning’ or ‘Pavlovian conditioning,’ and the experiment you’re referring to is often called ‘Pavlov’s dog!’

There was a very interesting study done by Rachman in 1966 where he showed that the same principles demonstrated in Pavlovian Conditioning can lead men to ‘train’ themselves into developing new fetishes. He showed a test group of heterosexual men pictures of sexualised women together with pictures of boots. After repeated exposure, the men eventually demonstrated a sexual response to the pictures of the boots in isolation, and, on further study, were shown to extend their sexual responses to other kinds of women’s footwear that had not been pictured – in short, they ‘learned’ to have a shoe fetish. If we replace the boot of Rachman’s study with the paraphernalia associated with the DDLG community (diapers, stuffies, pacifiers etc) then the danger posed to children becomes pretty obvious.

(Source: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6mD1BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA786&lpg=PA786&dq=rachman+1966+study+boot&source=bl&ots=ZCzA-ga7Vk&sig=ZLg4On-pAuuMU4w_RxFeI9JXyLc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwis0Pn947DRAhUGzWMKHctLDzcQ6AEILjAF#v=onepage&q=rachman%201966%20study%20boot&f=false)